| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
adma449
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 23
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:29 pm Post subject: Rear suspension |
|
|
Sooner or later, somthings gotta give. This somthing happens to be the rear suspension on my '85 Cutlass Supreme. Its not totally shot, but I can definetly tell its going to come. Now the question is what to do? I have bin told to replace the suspension with air bags, but I myself lean more towards the muscle car other then the pimp mobile (not sure if thats one word). I figure I should go to a GM dealer and get matching coil springs for the rear, and then throw on the newest from monroe shocks. Any ideas or comments?
-->Also just ordered 2 flowmaster Super 40 mufflers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
88 Coupe
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2929
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:14 am Post subject: Re: Rear suspension |
|
|
adma449 wrote: ........ This something happens to be the rear suspension ........ It's not totally shot, but I can definetly tell it's going to come ........
We are not mind readers. You must be more specific?
adma449 wrote: ........ I have been told to replace the suspension with air bags ........
Not a fix for anything I know about.
adma449 wrote: ........ Any ideas or comments? ........
First step in solving a problem, is to define it. The more accurate the definition, the closer you will be to the solution.
Norm |
|
| Back to top |
|
adma449
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 23
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The driver side rear shock is bleeding, the springs are old and she's leaning on the driver side. |
|
| Back to top |
|
88 Coupe
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2929
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Going by the information given:
adma449 wrote: The driver side rear shock is bleeding ........
Replace both shock absorbers.
Quote: ........ the springs are old ........
Not part of the problem.
Quote: ........ leaning on the driver side.
See what it looks like after you change the shocks.
Norm |
|
| Back to top |
|
adma449
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 23
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Any preferences on brand? Any insight into quality and design for shock absorbers? |
|
| Back to top |
|
andrewk
Joined: 18 May 2005
Posts: 1234
Location: Ames, IA
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
adma449 wrote: Any preferences on brand? Any insight into quality and design for shock absorbers?
Any good quality shock should do the trick. I prefer Monroe SensaTrak, but there are many other good ones out there.
Andrew |
|
| Back to top |
|
88 Coupe
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2929
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
adma449 wrote: Any preferences on brand? ........
Any OEM quality replacement. Except for my Coupes, I use whatever my supplier has on his shelf.
adma449 wrote: ........ Any insight into quality and design for shock absorbers?
Hard to improve on a part that was engineered as part of the original chassis. If the suspension is modified, or the car will be used for a different (racing?) purpose, a different design might be needed. At that point, one would pick a design to fit the new application.
Should have mentioned this before. If you can use a floor jack to lift the rear at the differential, you can check the front for a sag on one side. If so, you could have a broken spring on the low side.
Norm |
|
| Back to top |
|
adma449
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 23
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Im pretty certain the sag is in the rear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
88 Coupe
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2929
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
adma449 wrote: Im pretty certain the sag is in the rear.
And I gave you a simple way to to verify it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
85cieraholiday
Joined: 04 Jan 2004
Posts: 1030
Location: West Haven Connecticut
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
andrewk wrote: adma449 wrote: Any preferences on brand? Any insight into quality and design for shock absorbers?
Any good quality shock should do the trick. I prefer Monroe SensaTrak, but there are many other good ones out there.
Andrew
I just put new Monroe Sensa Trak shocks/stuts in my Olds, they helped the ride and control of the car though they were the most $$$$$ but it was worth it. My old shocks/struts were bad like yours seem to be and it made the car ride like a different car. |
|
| Back to top |
|
88 Coupe
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2929
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi 85cieraholiday, all,
New cheapos would have had the same effect.
Nothing against any brand. I just don't know that any one is that much better than the next.
Regards, Norm |
|
| Back to top |
|
85cieraholiday
Joined: 04 Jan 2004
Posts: 1030
Location: West Haven Connecticut
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
88 Coupe wrote: Hi 85cieraholiday, all,
New cheapos would have had the same effect.
Nothing against any brand. I just don't know that any one is that much better than the next.
Regards, Norm
I know that any new shock/strut would have made a difference in ride quality but I did some digging around and found that these seem to be well likes products. I was also looking for a soft ride shock/strut. I already knew that these were the model shock/strut I wanted but I asked the local parts store the question of which model would provide the softest ride (I know they guy who works there personaly so I know that the choice wasnt based on making money etc) and he said the Sensa Trak would be the best choice.
However I am about a picky with my Oldsmobile as can be so even the slightest difference in ride quality can make all the difference and since the Olds isnt a daily driver but a weekend cruiser I wanted to make sure that I got exactly the effect I wanted in order to keep the car enjoyable.
What is important is we need to know what this car will be used for. I took into consideration the fact that my car is being keptm stock so I used a part that I feel mirrored the original model yet improved on it with superior ride quality. If this car is going to be used for preformance a different product may be in order. |
|
| Back to top |
|
adma449
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 23
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For the present time, the car is a daily driver for 3 seasons, so anything that closly replaces or improves the original set. High performance is not an issue at the moment, but possibly in the future. |
|
| Back to top |
|
88 Coupe
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 2929
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
85cieraholiday: Good post.
Norm |
|
| Back to top |
|
onfir3
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
adma449 wrote: High performance is not an issue at the moment, but possibly in the future.
I don't mind if someone shoots this down or contradicts me, as I'm not an expert with these cars, this is just my experience.
Since you said perfomance could become a later issue, consider Sport adjustable shocks. KYB makes them (don't know about for your car sorry..) as well as Tokico. I just put tokico sport adjustables on my 85 pontiac 350'd firebird, and I love them to death. Set them to road or track settings, 1-5, adn they work great. 3 is fine for daily driving, 4 is a bit more tight, and what i prefer, but look into it. Tokico runs rather expensive though, so ya know. just my cents. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |