The Oldsmobile Connection

Erroneous Restrictionism! · Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 266

85cieraholiday wrote:

If your "on glue" you may need help that the Preformance section of this forum can't provide. For help with those "particular problems" you may want to check with your doctor.

Do YOU know that you spelled performance wrong?

Why is that the only thing people seem to remember is "on glue"?.
So I made a comment, which in turn I admited not having proof of. But it continues because?

Erroneous Restrictionism! · Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 266

88 Coupe wrote:

OK. We have two promotional videos, one with a mustang in it and one with a helicopter in it. They address something in this thread, because of one of andrewk's posts?

88 Coupe wrote:
..... there are no answers to any of my questions.....
Because i wasn't answering your questions..I was asked to prove it.

88 Coupe · Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: Re: Go Fast parts

Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: ........ Why is that the only thing people seem to remember is "on glue"?.
So I made a comment, which in turn I admited not having proof of. But it continues because?
Because it was a personal attack on a TOC member, and you have not apologized for it.

88 Coupe · Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:15 pm Post subject: Re: Go Fast parts

Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: ........ Do you know that you spelled performance wrong? ........
Do you know how many words you have misspelled, in the last week?

88 Coupe · Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:41 pm Post subject: Re: Go Fast parts

ahondadriversnightmare wrote: 88 Coupe wrote: ahondadriversnightmare wrote: ........ Here's most or all the answers for your questions ........
How do those links address anything in this thread?
Because of this!! andrewk wrote:
V8's a thing of the past? Prove it! Lets look at a few examples of Modern American cars powered by v8s and how they handle and stack up.
88 Coupe wrote: OK. We have two promotional videos, one with a mustang in it and one with a helicopter in it. They address something in this thread, because of one of andrewk's posts?

I'll ask again. Since there are no answers to any of my questions, or for that matter, nothing of any substance, in either of those two infomercials, what is your point?
ahondadriversnightmare wrote: Because i wasn't answering your questions ........
Read it again.

ahondadriversnightmare wrote: ........ I was asked to prove it.
You posted two irrelevant links that proved nothing.

88 Coupe · Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 10:01 pm Post subject: Re: Go Fast parts

88 Coupe wrote: ahondadriversnightmare wrote: ........ Are we here to help those with particular problems? ........
We are. How did you hope to accomplish that with your initial rant?
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: Because this is a discussion board. So now you can discuss it ........
And since you have chosen not to defend your own statements, there will be no discussion, and no responsibility.

Since you refuse to defend your own statements, does it make them any less bogus?

Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: ........ If something is presented then its a choice to ignore it or challange it.
You misspelled challenge.

Erroneous Restrictionism! · Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 266

88 Coupe wrote: Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: ........ Do you know that you spelled performance wrong? ........
Do you know how many words you have misspelled, in the last week?

Actually I don't..But you can enlighten me if you wish!

Erroneous Restrictionism! · Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 266

andrewk wrote:
V8's a thing of the past? Prove it! Lets look at a few examples of Modern American cars powered by v8s and how they handle and stack up.

88 Coupe wrote: OK. We have two promotional videos, one with a mustang in it and one with a helicopter in it. They address something in this thread, because of one of andrewk's posts?

ahondadriversnightmare wrote: ........ I was asked to prove it.
You posted two irrelevant links that proved nothing.

So I guess you never seen the Lotus kick the ass of a so called "American Icon".

andrewk · Joined: 18 May 2005 Posts: 1263 Location: Ames, IA

Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: andrewk wrote:
V8's a thing of the past? Prove it! Lets look at a few examples of Modern American cars powered by v8s and how they handle and stack up.

88 Coupe wrote: OK. We have two promotional videos, one with a mustang in it and one with a helicopter in it. They address something in this thread, because of one of andrewk's posts?

ahondadriversnightmare wrote: ........ I was asked to prove it.
You posted two irrelevant links that proved nothing.

So I guess you never seen the Lotus kick the ass of a so called "American Icon".

So what if it did? Who cares, and/or why does it apply? How does that prove the the V8 is "On its way out", or "is a thing of the past"? How has anything you have said in regards to my questions answer them?

An Oldsmobile quad4 engine (a 4 cyl engine used in the olds calais) once set a land speed record. Does that mean that a 4 cylinder is better than an 8, and that both the 8 and the 6 are on the way out for economical and performance reasons?

If you dont want to defend it, just say so.

Looking further into it, look at how many of those "American Icons" are made, as opposed to the Lotus, and look at the cost. Sacrifices are made in mass production to cheapen cost, or to accelerate production, or a multitude of other things.

Regards,

Andrew

88 Coupe · Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: Go Fast parts

88 Coupe wrote: Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: Do you know how many words you have misspelled, in the last week? Actually I don't ........
I didn't think so.

Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: ........ But you can enlighten me if you wish!
Here are three, just from today. And, just from one post.

Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: ........ If the seatbelt still funtions normally then why not "pull the blub" ........ Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: ........ However this is a discussion board and the replys were in fact still related to the topic.
I suggest you clean up your own act before you attack someone for the simple misspelling of a word.

88 Coupe · Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:44 pm Post subject: Re: Go Fast parts

Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote: ........ So I guess you never seen the Lotus kick the ass of a so called "American Icon".
American Icon?

In a non competitive environment, scripted and staged by an Ad Agency? An Ad Agency that collected a big paycheck by making a Ford look silly? An Ad agency that was hired by Lotus, because sales were slow?

You need to spend more time in the real world.