Perfect example of an oxymoron. He says I’m wrong, he can’t explain why, and he wants me to quit.


We can drop it after he gives us some actual explanations for his bogus statements, instead of posting unrelated images. Yes, I’m thinking of one in particular, and it’s not what you’re thinking.

Did anyone else notice? No one asked for proof of anything, yet he feels the need to show proof of his statements? Is it because he knows he can't explain them?

This time he posted images as proof of his own statement, and they made my original point for me. The Fool posted them without even realizing it.

We can see why he puts his tail between his legs and runs away when he’s asked to clarify his own statement.

One more time, in order to make sure the horse is actually dead.

Actually, because it's a genuine masterpiece.

For clarity, I'm showing my posts in their entirety.






Now we see why DrRansom442 doesn't like to post quotes. He can't even get that right.

But wait.

Is it possible to inadvertently combine parts of two different posts in the same quote?

And, in a such a way. that it looks like it wasn't edited?

And to make it look like he was addressing more comments than he actually was?

Comments that are impossible to dispute?



Now, I’m done with this thread.

Regards, Norm

After reading that last post I must say Norm Im sorry for doubting(spelling?) you, I must say your very good at reading past what is written, I never thought of why he felt the need to prove everything until you pointed it out.
Maybe you could apply for the title of TOC Olds God?

Hi 85cieraholiday, All,


I knew why you thought that, it's all that matters. I'm sorry I couldn't explain it at the time.


Actually, I read only what is there. Difference is, I've been reading every word he says.

To quote one of my grammar school teachers. "The easiest way to identify a pathological/habitual liar, is to note his/her fixation on proving their own statements, and their assumption that everyone else lies just like they do.


No doubt, you'll be able to recognize the next one on your own.


I'll be happy, if I can pass on some of my knowledge and experience, to your generation and learn from it at the same time.

Regards, Norm

Like I said from the get go, I have nothing to prove to you, as far as me backing up whatI say, sure....you seem to request it anyways, so why not save the time. I find it hilarious you you have to start new threads constantly and consult a "panel" of people who know more then you and yet you still can not admit that I maybe right (thus you are wrong) on quite a few points. sad really. Just let it go already. No new posts. No saying "he'll be along..." no waiting 5 days then posting because I ignore you. Just be a man ... walk away

I repeat, no one has asked you to prove anything.


First, you'll have to get something right.


No chance.

"What we have here is a failure to communicate"

to me and Webster's
"Clarification" means
explaination - like you can't understand what I am conveying
or
exemplification - perhaps I am giving you the benefit of doubt and assuming English is your primary language and providing the examples you are asking for. So, you you have either been asking me to prove my statements, over and over and over and over and over, or there is a comprehension issue. You tell me, then perhaps you can understand why I find you and your inane "clarification" so sophomoric.

Yes, we do. As long as you make baseless accusations, it will continue.

You have not yet shown the common courtesy to "post the quote".

Is it because you cannot find any such requests?

Is it because they do not exist?

Is it because of your inability to paste verbatim quotes, as was shown in my above post?


OK.

Since a request for either is the accepted norm during a discussion, and a demand for "proof" is not only rude, but argumentative, how does that "clarify" and/or "explain" why you think anyone has asked you for proof of anything?

The absurdity of the rest of your post speaks for itself.

Everyone: The first sentence is one of two in this post, that are "admissions" that his are correct statements. I only bring them up, because he has not recognized similar statements in the past.

wait I have no basis for my statements or I feel a need to "clarify" my statements without someone asking for proof which is it? Or maybe you mean my accusing you of lacking the proper creditials to dispute me ... sure i don't know you but I think you have done a great job proving my own assumptions.



anyone who has read the threads doesn't have to read the same tired "please clarify" over and over and over, you type it enough, I don't have to quote it.




An obvious ruse by omission, why not post the entire thought???? This is exactly what I mean when I call you sophomoric. You hear what you want to hear, not the complete thought. You try and play word games, by posting just bits and pieces. If this were a news publication, you'd probably be sued by now for your gross misquotes. I can count how many times you ask me to "clarify" and by "clarify" we ALL know you mean provide "proof" so by your own admission you are "not only rude but argumentative" add to this that you have to consult others, to accredit or discredit my statements or facts and you attempt to pass off your heresy as fact. I don't know should I feel honored that you try so hard, yet my statements seem to withstand the microscope? You obviously do not know the subject, that's fine. Stop acting like you do. Stop being "not only rude but argumentative". You further claim my knowledge is solely Internet based, yet all your info is coming not from YOUR experiences but from heresy -- they call that hypocrisy. Now I will concede that the people you are asking appear (yes I do not know them but unlike you I have yet to see any reasons to doubt their experiences or sincerity -- nor have any of them done as you'd hope and completely contradict me). You have spent a lot of time in effort on trying to debunk me -- I admit when I am wrong, as of yet, I haven't seen you do so, and at your request I point out some very specific examples. So again, why not just drop it. You are starting to irritate me (which I suspect is your real motivation)


I am well aware that you make me repeat myself over and over

Read it again, and respond to the statement I made, not the one you think I made.

Is our communication failure rooted in the fact that you have a problem reading and comprehending simple text? That would go far in explaining why you cannot answer simple questions regarding your own statements.

We are witnessing an outstanding example of the reason one should "post the quote" and the reason DrRansom442 is so reluctant to do so.



OK, done.

Does it make it any easier for you to respond to the question?


The following was one of two "admissions" I'm aware of. In it there are several more mistakes you did not address the first and second times I posted it.



He continues to insult me and he wants me to drop it?


The first sign he is going to put his tail between his legs.


Fool will continue to say I do not acknowledge it when he does get one right.

you have asked for exemplification and I've accommodated that request (sometimes proactively)


All through out school I tested collegic in reading and comprehension. I was even offerred to take my SATs as far back as the 5th grade. Since I have yet to ask you to retype your simplistic commentary, I think I comprehend what you are saying better then you obviously do


I really have no desire to re-read your multiple overly long postings, to point out the extact passages and quote them back to you, such "clarification" is "not only rude, but argumentative"


again you still failed to type the whole passage, another ruse
""Clarification" means
explaination - like you can't understand what I am conveying
or exemplification "
we all know you want examples or proof so by your own words you are being "not only rude, but argumentative" I really lack the desire to justify myself to you, the next 5 days "I spend researching the internet" to respond to you .... go ahead and believe that, but know that it really is just ignoring you.



but can you admit YOUR mistakes, so far you haven't. Pointing out what you think I said wrong is not admitting fault on your end


since we will continue being childish how about these childhood lessons "sticks and stones my break my bones, but words can never hurt me". or "sometimes it takes a bigger man to walk away from a fight"


no i've indicated the willingness to drop this several times and go on with our lives several times, but it is you that must fuel this. Personally I have better things to do. There is another adage I must be forgetting.
"never argue with a fool, others may not know the difference"
if I am a fool, it is for letting this go on as far as it has. you, however, are apperantly a fool from birth

[/quote]
I don't need a pat on the back for a job well done, a simple "I was wrong" would suffice. especially since you are the one that is challenging my statements. If they hold up (and they do), then just admit you were wrong. I've point out a couple blantent examples of where you were wrong and yet you still deny it

While you are rereading it, note the word "accusations" that I wrote,


and the word "statements" that you responded to.

Considering your impressive language credentials, I would think you could read, comprehend, and respond, with an accurate answer to a simple post.

.... and the crickets go .... chirp .... chirp .... chirp .... chirp .... chirp .... chirp .... chirp .... chirp ....