91buickman wrote:
Hot Wheels?
If you cannot find any, just say so.
-------------------
so you dont have the ability to scroll down or click next page i take it???
------------------
91buickman wrote:
........examples? ........
Jon Kaase Racing
735 West Winder Industrial Pkwy
Winder, Georgia 30680
(770) 307-0241
91buickman wrote:
........because the GN heads flow more ........
Do they?
http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/vie ... ht=#268953From post #7:
projectheavytouring wrote:
........ the FWD 3.8 heads are BETTER then the GN's ........
Yes, it is the same link.
91buickman wrote:
........ matches intended application? ........
Yes. Which part do you not understand?
--------------------------
what you dont understand is that the FWD heads in question are 3800 series 1 heads etc.... not LG3 which is before the series 1 smart guy. LG3 is the same engine code in the RWD GN and the FWD GM 3.8 v6's so get your facts straight. and yes the 3800 series motors to have more flow potential than the LG3 GN heads. but were talking LG3 remmber?
--------------------------
91buickman wrote:
........theres dail driven turbo cars and daily driven supercharged cars ........
And there have been, since the Fifties. What is your point?
-
---------------------------
remember the whole powerband remark you made or do i need to remind you of what you said?
--------------------------
91buickman wrote:
........ its on the op not you ........
The horse is dead.
--------------------
Then stop beating on it. Throughout all this , you havent made a single positive contribution once again.
---------------------
One last time: OP asked for specific information. You did not have it. Your unrelated reply was nothing more than a thread hijack.
---------------------------
look atyour replies- then ask yourself how much good am i doing the thread.----none.
-------------------------
91buickman wrote:
........ read your statments above ........
Quit acting like a child. Post the quote, then follow it with your response.
--------------------
i dont really care if you like me or respect me but the childish remark was completley irrevelent and has no bearing or place in the forum. as for quoting, how about you spell my name right first
-------------------
Do you need help?
http://www.oldsconnection.com/forum/faq ... e=bbcode#4--------------
............
----------------
91buickman wrote:
........ GN boost comes on low and is very responsive in stock form ........
88 Coupe wrote:
........ Not low enough. The mods that are needed to make it equal to the L67, are the same ones that make it less "streetable".
---------------------------------------
not low enough? that comment is ass backwards. The Gn motor is at 250-300hp the l67 is 240-260hp. its alot easier to make the tubo motor hit 400 hp then it would be for the l67 to hit 400hp..........FACT.
-----------------------------
........ but it takes alot more to make a l67 compare to a turbo 3.8 ........
Not relevant. You made a one sided/misleading statement. I clarified it with a simple comparison.
You do not impress anyone by changing the subject.
-------------------------------
so you speak for everyone now huh....
------------------------------
91buickman wrote:
........ so have you driven a turbo 3.8? ........
Have you driven an L67?
--------------------------
since you answered my question with a question ill end it and tell you ive driven both. thats why i can talk....how about you??
--------------------------
Do you think anyone cares about your azz dyno?
----------------
another irrevelant remark. I never mentioned azz dyno anywhere, so where did you come up with that from? trying to belittle me isnt working for you norm sorry....
-------------------
91buickman wrote:
88 Coupe wrote:
........ By definition, it takes power to turn a positive displacement pump. The amount used, is determined by the desired net power gain.
The limits, of both, are limited by engine design, not by how the blower is driven ........
wrong ........ engine design has nothing to do with the fact of parasitic losses caused by roots type superchargers ........
Wrong? In order to make that allegation, you must address the actual statement.
Here is the first part again:
88 Coupe wrote:
........ The amount used, is determined by the desired net power gain.
The statement has been accurate for the last eighty plus years. It is still accurate now.
And here is the second part, rephrased:
88 Coupe wrote:
........ The power limits, of both, are limited by engine design, not by how the blower is driven ........
so to simplify this...once again... the l67 gen 3or 5 m90 eaton robs up to 50hp on the top end while the Turbo motor isnt taking any. Fact remains a roots blower will ALWAYS take power to make power.