It is currently Tue May 14, 2024 1:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





 Page 1 of 5 [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:45 pm 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 326
thought you might want to check out a little side reasearch I am doing...you wouldnt have to get rid of the SI shortblock! lol

Links:
http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/sh ... 339&page=2
http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/vie ... hp?t=33178

it looks like it will work...then I can tell ya exactly what you need fer more power from your Vin C LN3....but use the L67 SC instead of our Turbo...

been talking with some Holden Guys, down under.....

Image
Image

James



_________________
Psychotic Gearhead/Redneck/Mekanik
Image
94 Olds 442 Twin engine's! 6.9L/425 cu inches and 12 cylinders!
Image
13.81 @ over 98 MPH! consistent 1.9s 60'!
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:22 pm 
TOC Admin
TOC Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 3:58 pm
Posts: 3166
Images: 29
Location: Michigan, USA
Hmmm....sounds like some interesting stuff....
Would be nice to know whether you could actually make it work or not.
Keep us updated with what ya find. :yes:

TOC Admin
Brando



_________________
1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue GLS
1987 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:08 pm 
TOC Admin
TOC Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 3:58 pm
Posts: 3166
Images: 29
Location: Michigan, USA
Series I:
Camshaft Journal Diameter = 1.785-1.786 in
Bearing-to-Journal Clearance = 0.0005-0.0025 in

Series II:
Journal Diameter = 1.8462-1.8448 in
Bearing-to-Journal Clearance = 0.0016-0.0047 in

TOC Admin
Brando



_________________
1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue GLS
1987 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 11:25 pm 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am
Posts: 3196
Images: 10
Location: Southern California
Quote:
Series I:
Camshaft Journal Diameter = 1.785-1.786 in
Bearing-to-Journal Clearance = 0.0005-0.0025 in

Series II:
Journal Diameter = 1.8462-1.8448 in
Bearing-to-Journal Clearance = 0.0016-0.0047 in


:lol:



_________________
Harry S. Truman wrote:
When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 3:05 am 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 326
Nothing a little work with a Lathe couldnt fix....
my interest in measuring everything at the Jyard is to see if when I mod the cam (SII) to fit, the lobes will still fit through the SI block cam bearings

A custom cam grind with SI journals and SII lobe phasing/pattern is around 300$ (some places maybe cheaper)

But borrowing my friends Lathe is free.....



_________________
Psychotic Gearhead/Redneck/Mekanik
Image
94 Olds 442 Twin engine's! 6.9L/425 cu inches and 12 cylinders!
Image
13.81 @ over 98 MPH! consistent 1.9s 60'!
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 3:32 am 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am
Posts: 3196
Images: 10
Location: Southern California
Quote:
Nothing a little work with a Lathe couldnt fix ...........


:lol:



_________________
Harry S. Truman wrote:
When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:31 am 
TOC Village Idiot
TOC Village Idiot
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:06 pm
Posts: 2415
Images: 40
Location: Canada
so... poor me with the VIN 3 3.8L... There's no hope of me ever getting more power out of this plant... Shes locked in at pretty much stock.



_________________
"I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."

http://www.cardomain.com/id/88delta88
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:46 am 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 2:37 am
Posts: 413
Images: 12
Location: Portage, Michigan
88delta88 wrote:
so... poor me with the VIN 3 3.8L... There's no hope of me ever getting more power out of this plant... Shes locked in at pretty much stock.

at lesat you arnt stuck with a 3.1, it's modable but with the amt. of money needed to put a supercharger or anything on it I might as well buy a 3.8 supercharged and put it in :lol: :shock:



_________________
Oldsmobile 8/21/1897 To 4/29/2004
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:17 am 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 326
Well Got a bunch of pics from the Jyard looks very doable for putting the SII cam in the SI block, got to go back to the Jyard on the 3rd of May with a new puller, I wiped my old one out (dont ask...), only got the SII cam outa the block. the SII victom was a 95 bonnevile SE build date 9/94, 95 model year engine vin K SII NA 3800, gave up a host of secrets....
The SI was from a 90 Pont Bonnevile Vin C LN3 SI NA 3800 (from what I understand, is refered to as the Buick in OZ, the 95 and later SII are refered to as Ecotec) and because the puller broke I had to break the cover off to get to the cam gear and see the snout of the crank, also to pull it, then we started running out of time so I was unable to pull the rockers and pushrods and lifters to pull the cam out (also need to drop the cradle...) so that is what is left for the next run down in may.
I have some interesting things to show...
I will post Pics tomarrow night...gotta work on the 442 on monday

nothing a little work with a lathe and pridgport and some redneck engine-uity couldnt overcome....

James & Al

BTW in one manual I found that it says that the cams didnt go to the larger journal diameter till 97-98 SII's but I will know more on May 3rd

looking very doable... and since the (86) 87 3.8 is so similar to the LN3 block wise (they are the first years switched to the hyd roller cam) it would work on yers, you just may not have to deal with a balance shaft gear....



_________________
Psychotic Gearhead/Redneck/Mekanik
Image
94 Olds 442 Twin engine's! 6.9L/425 cu inches and 12 cylinders!
Image
13.81 @ over 98 MPH! consistent 1.9s 60'!
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:21 am 
TOC Member
TOC Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:09 pm
Posts: 156
Images: 27
Location: Pocatello, Idaho
L67 drop.



_________________
2001 Pontiac SSEi - 15.0 @93...pretty much stock
1998 Pontiac SSEi - 14.3 @95...3.2...FWI...nothing else
1993 Pontiac SSEi - 15.2 @90...2.3...CAI...nothing else
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 2:52 am 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 326
Hans? L67 drop? we cant afford an L67 but we'd gladly take the SII heads 1.8 and 1.52 intake and exhaust valves over the SI 1.71 and 1.487 dia valves and put them on the SI block (still looking to CC the head chambers for an estimate of how much we can lower comp for the Turbocharger.

you know the SI and SII use the same lifters? oh and the SI and SII do have the same cam journal diameters if it's a 95 and some 96 SII blocks then the cam bearing part #'s change... to the larger ones....no wonder my manual said that the 97+ have the larger cam bearing journal diameters.

so far it looks like all we have to do is drill and tap two holes in the front of the SI and use the SII cam thrust plate....with a SII T chain set...

custom length pushrods may still be neccisary but research is ongoing, the next trip to the Jyard is May 3rd or so so I can do more measuring/cc'ing

BTW the SII roller rockers are lighter than the L27 roller rockers....

still working on my full writup and pics but this sure looks like it can be done by anyone!
more to come! stay tuned!!!!!

James



_________________
Psychotic Gearhead/Redneck/Mekanik
Image
94 Olds 442 Twin engine's! 6.9L/425 cu inches and 12 cylinders!
Image
13.81 @ over 98 MPH! consistent 1.9s 60'!
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 2:20 pm 
TOC Admin
TOC Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 3:58 pm
Posts: 3166
Images: 29
Location: Michigan, USA
If you do accomplish this...it'd be a great addition to the tech section.
:)

TOC Admin
Brando



_________________
1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue GLS
1987 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:53 pm 
TOC Member
TOC Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:09 pm
Posts: 156
Images: 27
Location: Pocatello, Idaho
Turbocharged400sbc wrote:
Hans? L67 drop? we cant afford an L67 but we'd gladly take the SII heads 1.8 and 1.52 intake and exhaust valves over the SI 1.71 and 1.487 dia valves and put them on the SI block (still looking to CC the head chambers for an estimate of how much we can lower comp for the Turbocharger.

you know the SI and SII use the same lifters? oh and the SI and SII do have the same cam journal diameters if it's a 95 and some 96 SII blocks then the cam bearing part #'s change... to the larger ones....no wonder my manual said that the 97+ have the larger cam bearing journal diameters.

so far it looks like all we have to do is drill and tap two holes in the front of the SI and use the SII cam thrust plate....with a SII T chain set...

custom length pushrods may still be neccisary but research is ongoing, the next trip to the Jyard is May 3rd or so so I can do more measuring/cc'ing

BTW the SII roller rockers are lighter than the L27 roller rockers....

still working on my full writup and pics but this sure looks like it can be done by anyone!
more to come! stay tuned!!!!!

James


L67 drop is my universal answer to all mechanical problems. There is a member on another forum that took my comment seriously and bought a Series II L67 and is dropping it into a 1989 n/a bonneville or buick I forget.



_________________
2001 Pontiac SSEi - 15.0 @93...pretty much stock
1998 Pontiac SSEi - 14.3 @95...3.2...FWI...nothing else
1993 Pontiac SSEi - 15.2 @90...2.3...CAI...nothing else
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:38 am 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 326
OK fer the fellow psychotic gearheads out there....
The rear 90 3800 LN3 Vin C engine in our twin engine 94 Olds Cutlass 442 will be getting Turbocharged this winter and get a Mega Squirt EFI setup (90 non PCM controlled trans) and we have already swapped to the Delco ignition, there are plans for an intercooler to be plumbed into the mix to feed a TB located on the belt side of the engine for better plumbing.
One of my goals is to swap the SII cam, heads, intake onto the SI 3800, and have the specific modifications required to make this Hybrid, available to anyone else who might be interested in getting more power from their SI 3800.

All references to SI are taken from a 90 Vin C 3800 and all SII are in reference to a 95 Vin K 3800 engine, these may also correlate to other SI and SII engine years.

SI & SII 3800 differences/similarities: They seem to have the same bolt pattern on the ends of the heads, but different accessory mounts, this would allow the use of the SI accessory’s and belt drive with the SII heads. The 90 LN3 block (all SI) has a taller deck height which with using the series II Lower intake manifold will require spacers with the SII heads on the SI block. The different looking coolant bosses from the block into the heads is not a big deal, the head gaskets will still seal them... at least the SII V6 isn’t reverse flow and have the massive differences like the Gen I (regular) small block Chevy V8 vs. LT1/LS1 Gen II/III V8’s though more than a couple of people have put LT1 heads on the Gen I SBC with just a couple of modifications. Here is a side by side comparison of the SI and SII block surfaces.
Image
The camshaft lifters are hydraulic roller for both engines but the series II has shorter pushrods for its lower deck height, there is a possibility the stock LN3 pushrods will work with the SII heads, but custom length pushrods are not expensive, if they are required. The valve arrangement is different between the SI and SII, i.e. the cam lobe timing events are tailored for the I-E-I-E-I-E valve positions of the SII and not the E-I-I-E-I-E of the LN3, this is one of the only things that I have found different between the cams. The other major change concerns the balance shaft bearings, the sleeve bearings (SII) that got changed from roller bearings (SI) on the balance shaft. The SI & SII cams have identical bearing journal spacing as well as the lobes, so they would line up correctly with the lifter bores. In one manual I found that there are differences in the SI and SII bearing journal diameters, but it also states that it is 97 and later SII that has the larger diameter, whether or not this is the case still remains to be seen.
Series I:
Camshaft Journal Diameter = 1.785-1.786 in
Bearing-to-Journal Clearance = 0.0005-0.0025 in
Series II:
Journal Diameter = 1.8462-1.8448 in
Bearing-to-Journal Clearance = 0.0016-0.0047 in

If this is the case, then it would require the early SII cam to slide into the SI cam bearings or the later SII cam would have to be chucked in a Lathe and cut the journals down and polish them to the correct diameter for proper bearing clearances. The other difference between the SI & SII cams is the snout and timing chain differences. The SI cam (in the 2 SI blocks I have looked at) uses a flange on the front of the cam to keep it from walking back in the block and uses a cam button on a spring to keep it from walking forward into the T chain cover. This pic is of a non balance shaft equipped SI.
Image
The SII cam however (has no front flange and can slid back and forth no problem) slips into the block and has a flat retainer/thrust plate that bolts on with two flush head torx bolts, this keeps the cam from being able to walk forward in the block.
Image
Then after the plate the balance shaft gear slips over the snout of the cam with the cam Timing chain gear going on right after and tightened with a single bolt, and with the Thrust plate behind the balance shaft gear/T chain gear this prevents the cam from walking backward in the block. And yes the SI and SII do have the same cam journal diameters if it's a 95 (and some/all 96?) SII blocks then the cam bearing part #'s change... to the larger ones....no wonder my manual said that the 97+ have the larger cam bearing journal diameters-and this is also shown by the 95 and 96 SII blocks using the same part # cam bearings as the SI blocks. The Cam specs are as follows for a 90 Vin C 3800 duration at .050 is 188 deg on the intake and 191 deg on the exhaust with the lobe separation angle of 114 degrees (no valve lift #’s found-yet). The 95 Vin K SII cam specs out at 180 deg intake and 191 degrees on the exhaust at .050, and the lobe separation of 115 degree’s, the SII cam also lists valve lift at .411/.408, on the intake/exhaust valves respectively.


The other difference that I can see is that the pushrods will have more of a tilt to them than the SI pushrods when the SII heads are placed on the SI block but this shouldn’t be a problem as plenty of engines have been designed with pushrods that are not directly in line with the axis of the lifter bore, the only side effect would be a little more thrust loading on the lifter to bore surface. Did you know the SI and SII use the same lifters? Same part #’s! The pushrods on the SI are 7.965 inches in overall length where the SII pushrods are 6.959 inches in length. This would seem to indicate that the shorter deck height is approx 1 inch on the SII block (presumably for a smaller engine package that will fit into smaller engine bays) but I have yet to verify this through specs or through measurements. This hybrid engine may still require custom length pushrods for proper lifter preload and valvetrain geometry

The SII exhaust manifolds would have to be used with the SII heads, however it seems possible that the SI tubular log manifolds can be cut and modified to fit the SII head, however with the plethora of aftermarket SII headers this wouldn’t be necessary, though the X-over pipe would be a little longer due to the SI blocks taller deck height. Here are pics of the SII front (cast) and rear (tube steel) exhaust manifolds.
Image
Image
SI front manifold made of tubular steel
Image

The pistons in the SI are listed as having two 1.5 mm and one 3 mm ring grooves with a 1.377 compression height rated at 8.5 to 1 Compression ratio with a dish of .260 inch deep x 3.050 inches in diameter. The SII pistons spec out as having, one 1.2 mm, one 1.5 mm, and one 2 mm ring grooves, with a 1.090 inch compression height and having a dish of .050 inch deep x 2.9 inch diameter.

Now for the cylinder heads, the primary difference between the SI and SII heads are the intake and exhaust valve and port locations/order, with the SI head having a EIIEIE arrangement and the SII having a “symmetrical portâ€



_________________
Psychotic Gearhead/Redneck/Mekanik
Image
94 Olds 442 Twin engine's! 6.9L/425 cu inches and 12 cylinders!
Image
13.81 @ over 98 MPH! consistent 1.9s 60'!
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:37 pm 
TOC Member
TOC Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am
Posts: 3196
Images: 10
Location: Southern California
Hi Turbocharged400sbc. hello everyone,

What's the latest?

here's one you might be interested in. Some good information as long as you keep it in its original context.

SI has a 1.377 compression height. What is the SII?

Have you degreed #3 and #4 to see if the SI cam will work with those heads?

Regards, Norm



_________________
Harry S. Truman wrote:
When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
Offline
 Profile Personal album  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 Page 1 of 5 [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: