|
It is currently Wed Apr 17, 2024 7:45 pm
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
|
|
|
91parkave
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:04 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 10:25 am Posts: 541 Images: 4
|
IMO you could go for the 84-85 turbo regal upgrade, its still carbed using a blow through setup, it wouldnt be hard for you to set it up but getting it tuned will be a bitch as will supercharging . If you go fuelinjection youll need to rewire youre gauges a intank fuel pump or EFI in line pump to supply fuel, plus the computer, wiring harness etc... in my opinion id ditch the 231 you have and go for a 350,or 383 or if you want the 6 you could also swap a l67 in like this guy http://www.3800pro.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10998
and http://hometown.aol.com/powertrip186/index.html
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
88 Coupe
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:26 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am Posts: 3196 Images: 10 Location: Southern California
|
sean000 wrote: Anyone know if you can get a supercharger for my buick 231?
Yes. There are many superchargers, both mechanical and exhaust driven, that are the correct size for your 231.
I don't know that there are any kits available to make any of them work properly, in your application, so there will likely be some custom fabrication involved.
You will also need to reinforce the engine internals, and drivetrain, to withstand the stress of the increased power.
Which way you choose to go, will depend on several factors. The most important is, the size of your budget.
Norm
_________________ Harry S. Truman wrote: When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
88 Coupe
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:05 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am Posts: 3196 Images: 10 Location: Southern California
|
91buickman wrote: ........ and go for a 350,or 383 ........
350 Olds would be a good alternative, if he had not asked about a supercharger. It is a common transplant, and if the OP chooses that option, we will answer any questions he might have.
By "383" I will assume you not referring to the Mopar engine, which actually was a 383, or the Olds 383 which would be a custom spec, but the more common Chev 383, which is an internally modified 350 Chev.
As most everyone here knows, I do not normally talk about my Chevs/Chev engines on an Olds site.
But, in this case, I might make an exception.
Other than: It is an internet "catchphrase", tell us about the "383" you are recommending.
Norm
_________________ Harry S. Truman wrote: When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
88 Coupe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:21 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am Posts: 3196 Images: 10 Location: Southern California
|
91buickman wrote: ........ if youre a hardcore olds engine purist ........ Other than in a childish rant, no one has ever suggested that I am, or am not. Either way, it has nothing to do with this discussion. The fact that you made the, off topic, remark indicates (along with the rest of your post) your continuing reluctance to address your own statements. 91buickman wrote: ........ please disregard my 383 commment ........ Another childish comment. You posted it, you live with the consequences. 91buickman wrote: ........ yes i am talking about a stroked 350= 383. Your numbers do not match. It would take a custom (one of a kind) crank to do so. This would mean, you are not talking about a 350 Chev block, using the common (400 Chev crankshaft) configuration. Not likely your "383" would fit into the OP's budget. But since it did not address my post, it is off topic. If you would like to discuss it further, you can start another thread. In it, we can also discuss the abundance of internet misinformation on the subject. Back on topic: 91buickman wrote: ........ yes i am talking about a stroked 350= 383. Everyone on the internet is aware of those numbers. They are the "catchphrase" I alluded to. In reality, a 400 crank in a 283/302/327/350 block is used, as part of hundreds of different combinations, to fit specific applications. From what little we know of the OPs needs, I would not suggest the one in the my (shown above) Chev, for use in his application. Here it is, again: 88 Coupe wrote: ........ Other than: It is an internet "catchphrase", tell us about the "383" you are recommending ........
Norm
_________________ Harry S. Truman wrote: When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
88 Coupe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:17 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am Posts: 3196 Images: 10 Location: Southern California
|
91buickman wrote: ........ if any more clarifaction is needed please feel free to ask. Here it is, again: 88 Coupe wrote: Here it is, again: 88 Coupe wrote: ........ Other than: It is an internet "catchphrase", tell us about the "383" you are recommending ........
Norm
_________________ Harry S. Truman wrote: When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
91parkave
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:29 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 10:25 am Posts: 541 Images: 4
|
91parkave wrote: Im sorry but youre taking my post out of context severley, the olds purist comment was because some people (not knowing the op's stand on that) would want to make it all oldsmobile (and in know way was i even thinking of clown when i wrote that)... thats why i said disregard my 383 comment. yes i was reffering to the chevy 383 which are not exspensive by any means to build as compared to using forced induction on the 231 v6 he has now. if any more clarifaction is needed please feel free to ask.
but since i dont know th e op's specific goals and budget,I cant recomend anything else but engine choices as for the specifics that will have to adressed after we find out the op''s needs
-marshall
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
88 Coupe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:18 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am Posts: 3196 Images: 10 Location: Southern California
|
91buickman wrote: ........ since i dont know th e op's specific goals and budget, I cant recomend anything ........
OK. With no knowledge of his circumstances, and little knowledge of the topic, You gave your BS recommendations to a complete stranger. A stranger who was depending on you, as a representative of TOC, for truthful advice, and accurate information.
Excellent way to showcase your maturity.
Norm
_________________ Harry S. Truman wrote: When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
88 Coupe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:00 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am Posts: 3196 Images: 10 Location: Southern California
|
91buickman wrote: ........ youre taking my post out of context ........
Your words say what they say. I take nothing out of context.
This is just another attempt to avoid responsibility for your own BS statement.
Norm
_________________ Harry S. Truman wrote: When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
88 Coupe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:19 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am Posts: 3196 Images: 10 Location: Southern California
|
91buickman wrote: taking everything i say out of context ,.......
Post a quote.
Yes, I know, there are a lot to choose from. Just choose any one that will help you make your point.
When you are ready, you can post it here:
http://www.oldsconnection.com/forum/vie ... php?t=2230
It is why I started the thread.
Norm
_________________ Harry S. Truman wrote: When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
88 Coupe
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:50 pm |
TOC Member |
|
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:25 am Posts: 3196 Images: 10 Location: Southern California
|
So, in other words, you could not find an example to post.
I am surprised, beyond belief.
Norm
_________________ Harry S. Truman wrote: When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|