Are we going to have to start a poll and a thread regarding Erroneous Restrictionism! posing a problem to the threads? Let us know when you have something to add to the discussion ON topic.

Go ahead with that...We will see that I don't care how others see or feel towards me!

I must be wrong for making a statement!

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Ok, I meant to start a discussion, not a fight. Erroneous Restrictionism!, very uncalled for. Take this crap somewhere else.

If you dont care, why do you expect us to? No one is going to notice anything except the fact that you are unreasonable, and unpleasant to converse with.


I'll second that.

There is a road leading somewhere, that is paved with some kind of intentions.

The wording in your post did not match the intent that you later announced.


Is this how you think one should start a discussion? Looks like you intended to start a fight. Or am I reading something that is not there?

Erroneous Restrictionism! jumped in because you opened the door. Now you are on his case for joining in the fight you started?



He does not understand the significance of this thread. Does that tell you anything?

I am finished participating in your thread hijack.

Norm

Should I have to follow your idea of a "forums rulebook"?

I'm not fighting, and yes I understand what you you're trying to achieve!

I'll voice my opinion in any way I feel is right to me, you don't like it or understand it that's fine. I'm well aware of what I said and I meant it 100% "Practice what you preach"

88 Coupe!
By you claiming that "TheLSS" opened the door, couldn't be more right!...But in your doing so you created a retaliation, so in essence you proved your own theory and "broke one of your own "rules"!...You blew the door he opened off the hinges!

Wanna be noticed?...Run for President!

Flames or whatever you call them will happen, regardless!

Hi all,

Been looking for this post. Had trouble finding it because of the multiple hijacks.

Change of the subject title did not help much.


And you know that for a fact? Were you there to witness the diagnosis? Do you know what the shop found?


Are you suggesting I was right in asking about the rationale the shop used?


OK. You are participating in a dishonest operation. How does that make the shop in question, less than reputable?


I read your introductory thread. I see no reason to comment further.


More dishonest?


Accept what? Have I not accepted anything? Have you read something I did not write?


And I couldn't?

I was not there at the time. That would be the reason for my questions. Or "flames" as you prefer to call them.

We are trying to work with less information than is required to make accurate judgments. What he may have been told by that "dishonest" shop might be the key to solving his problem.


Interesting statement.

Those who participate in the "lowlife" practice of insults and name calling, seem to be the same ones that invite one and all to flame them in return.


Arguments that I cause?

My poor attitude?

Defending those poor people?

I have belittled?

For no reason?

Why does the name "Don Quixote" come to mind?

Norm

88Delta88-
"Are we going to have to start a poll and a thread regarding Erroneous Restrictionism! posing a problem to the threads?"


Done

Click Here

Forums rulebook? If one exists, I am not aware of it.


Call it anything you wish. Doesn't change the fact that you took TheLSS's lead, and started your own branch of the same fight.


You do not have a clue.

Of course I was right. That is why I posted it.


Retaliation? The message was to him. He understood it, and did not post further. That was its only purpose

You, however, did not understand it, and we have been seeing proof of that in your continuing posts.


My theory? My rules? Door off the hinges?

So, in essence, you do not read English very well. Maybe you should hire a competent "French" translator.


I call them by the same name everyone else (except you) uses. Following is an example of a flame:


In this case, it was an unprovoked personal attack.


But, without the morons who are responsible for them, they would not exist.

Accusations have now become contradictions!

You're an abstract kinda guy, E.R.

Well... there is a rules page... http://www.oldsconnection.com/forum/rules.php

"The LSS"- any luck with your ABS yet?

Yep.