Now, for my response to the opening post.
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ Some of you may feel he is most of time "overboard" when it comes to his postings ........
And that is why he started a special thread for you to discuss your objections to any of those postings.
There is only one rule involved. Is one rule, too many for you to handle?
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ I am by no means trying to cause "defamation of character" that would be wrong of me to do so ........
The nature of this thread/poll makes that obvious to all of us.
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ These are only opinions that "you" would like to express ........
I believe everyone that has wished to, has. The consensus shows you have no basis for your opinion.
The fact that you cannot provide, even one, example of your many imaginary grievances, goes a long way toward proving that point.
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ I left this site once before due to the "ongoing annoyance" from his post reply tactics ........
We know you will be unable to cite an example because of your many disabilities, so I will help you find one.
Is this the thread you are referring to?
http://www.oldsconnection.com/forum/vie ... php?p=7254Did you think that by changing your name, a simple search would not show ahondadriversnightmare's posts?
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ I came back assuming it may have ended due to the extensive boredom he might have induced us with ........
Do you think your A. D. D. might have anything to do with your boredom? Do you think that everyone without it, gets bored as easily as you do?
Did you think that the same simple search would not show that you never left?
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ I, Knowing that if I leave(again)to another site, will not have an affect on anyone here by me doing so ........
No effect? On the contrary, we would be rid of one large problem.
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ However I do understand that his information proves valuable to some ........
Thank you, for throwing him a bone.
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ But how he pushes topics to the extreme could cause some members to take offence and not return ........
No doubt in anyones mind. If you would like to post an example here or
here, we can discuss why you think he drove them off, or if they came here with a line of BS, and left because they did not like having their hand slapped.
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ I cannot prove this theory, but it is something for "you" to think about
Easy enough to prove, or disprove. Simply post the quote and, though the ensuing discussion, the truth will make itself known.
Do you refuse to post that quote, because you fear you will be exposed as one of those BS artists?
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ If you wish not to leave a comment on this subject you have a choice!
If you would like to participate in this poll I provided as an option by all means go ahead
Speaking in behalf of all TOC members:
Thank you for giving us permission to respond to your silly poll.
Please, excuse me for not participating in it.
Erroneous Restrictionism! wrote:
........ If anybody takes offence to this please speak up and I'll address it accordingly ........
The floor is all yours.
_________________
Harry S. Truman wrote:
When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship.