Has Erroneous Restrictionism! helped or hurt the TOC forums? Has his membership made no change to the quality of the forums? Please cast and vote and leave a message below.

It always has been, and will continue to be, my policy not to participate in polls of any type.

In this case I will make an exception, however, be aware of the possibility that I might be a little biased.

Regards, Norm

Be aware of the possibility that this was my plan!

What plan? Have you been on some of that glue you like so much?

Are you seriously that retarded!..You started a poll, cause you think it'll justify something!

Pull your head out of your ass, I think the methane is getting to you!

I'll just tell you!!...Your doing exactly what your against...I only reply to it to piss you off, to get you to reply back...So I guess it makes you just as "childish" as me.

Like I said.

The word retarted should have a question mark after it, it you were trying to make a statement such as "You are seriously retarded" then a ! would be fine.

Yeah I started a poll, not because I want to justify something, just wanted to see if others feel the same way toward you as I do.

My head won't fit up my ass.

The methane didn't get to me: "Methane is a significant and plentiful fuel which is the principal component of natural gas. "- From Wikipedia, we have oil not natural gas here.

"I'll just tell you!!...Your doing exactly what your against"

Im a gemini, I have split personalities so I guess thats someting I can justify?

"I only reply to it to piss you off, to get you to reply back"

Its too bad you have to be like this because being the National Advisor in OCA for your car, I could have given you a lot of valuble information. Your question last week about production numbers is just one of the many questions I deal with and can reply within a few hours.


"So I guess it makes you just as "childish" as me"

I guess so since Im clearly as "retarded" as you.

I think your anger gets in the way of your clear judgement sometimes. The pill stated above would rectify it quite well. I think the absence of words sometimes proves more of a point than a retaliation.

Easy for you to say. Especially, since you made the statement after the fact.

The odds of that possibility being true, are non existent.

Seems like?

That has been your plan, all along.

Problem is, you planned for the "fat" to be Norm.

Now that your silly plan has backfired in your face, do you think that declaring yourself a "victim", again, will help advance your original agenda?

Not likely.

Or, did you mean something else, but your "A. D. D."/"Dyslexia" made you type something other that you intended?

You certainly cannot blame it on the IQ you claimed to have.

Wow...nice mafia feel goin now!...I can care less about you being what you say you are...You think bribery works ????..You think I'll say sorry so I can get info on Oldsmobiles...Get a life, U Fuckup!

Is that a question? If so, he is not. A case could easily be made, however, that you are retarded because it was you who set the precedent.


Why do you complain about him doing exactly what you have done?


Is this something you would say to him in person? Face to face?

Is it something a child might say to another, in a schoolyard?

Do I need to write it in French?


Do you think that is something we do not know?


As usual, you have no clue. Your Dyslexia again? Or maybe, something got lost in the translation.

Come back and read this after, you sober up.

Maybe that 134 IQ, of yours, will help you get a clue.

The appology seen by all a few days prior has expired apparently.